Blog Details

Balfour vs. Balfour Case - Indian Contract Act

Author - Associate Zarmeen Jahan

Balfour vs. Balfour Case - Indian Contract Act

Get an in-depth understanding of the landmark case of Balfour vs Balfour with Lawyered. Read the case summary, study the PDF and learn more about the implications of the ruling. In this article, we shall discuss the balfour vs balfour case summary.

Introduction

In 1919, Balfour vs Balfour case law gave birth to the purpose to create legal relations theory in contract law. In a dispute between a husband and wife, Lord Justice Atkin said that domestic commitments were not within the jurisdiction of contract law. The main point made was that contracts are promises. But if contracts are a promise, are they legally enforceable?

Balfour vs Balfour Case Study/ Balfour vs Balfour Case Summary:

In the Balfour vs Balfour case study[Balfour vs Balfour (1919)2 KB 571] also to be said Mr Balfour vs Mrs Balfour, Mr Balfour and his wife Mrs Balfour went to England for a vacation, and his wife became ill and needed medical attention. They made an agreement that Mrs Balfour was to remain behind in England when the husband returned to Ceylon (Sri Lanka) and that Mr Balfour would pay her £30 a month until he returned. This understanding was made while their relationship was fine. However, the relationship later soured and the husband stopped making the payments. 

In this Balfour vs Balfour case law, The wife sought to enforce the agreement. Later the parties separated and were divorced. The wife brought this action for the money her husband had promised to pay to her but had failed to do so.

Procedural History

In this Balfour vs Balfour case summary, An additional judge of King’s Bench Division presided by Justice Sargant, held that the husband was under a responsibility to support his wife and there exists a strong contract between the husband and the wife. The consent of the wife to this order of monthly transfer was a valid thought to constitute a required contract between the couple.

Issue involved in Balfour vs Balfour case study-

In Mr Balfour vs Mrs Balfour was the contract between them valid in nature?

The contention of the appellant

In the Balfour vs Balfour case law, the promise made by Mr Balfour of providing monthly expenses to his wife Mrs Balfour was a domestic agreement and not a legal agreement nor so the husband didn't have any intention of creating a legal agreement. Which after turns to be in Mr Balfour vs Mrs Balfour i.e, His wife went to the court later on.

The contention of the respondent

In the Balfour vs Balfour case study we learn that, the wife is deemed to get the given amount of money as the husband entered into a domestic contract by offering his wife £30 and the wife agreed and stayed back in England.

What was held in Balfour vs Balfour case law 1919-

The Balfour vs Balfour case summary says that in the case of Mr Balfour vs Mrs Balfour the agreement was purely social and domestic in nature and characteristic and therefore it was presumed that the parties did not intend to be legally bound.

Balfour vs Balfour case Judgement -

The Balfour vs Balfour case summary says that in the case Mr Balfour vs Mrs Balfour, The Agreements made between a husband and wife to provide capitals are generally not contracts because generally, the parties do not intend that they should be attended by legal ends. Commonly parties to a marriage will make arrangements for personal or household expenses. Even though there may be present what would amount to consideration if it had occurred between different parties. The Court of Appeal unanimously held that there was no enforceable agreement.

As discussed, Balfour vs Balfour case summary made it very clear that the legal intention to enter into a contract is very necessary. The Balfour vs Balfour case judgement  mostly moves around the concept of legal intention as a basic and for most necessity to validate a contract.

Conclusion

In the Balfour vs Balfour case study we studied that at common law, a contract is not enforceable unless the parties intended the contract to create legal relations. Whether or not the parties intended to create legal relations is determined accurately by examining the circumstances existing at the time of execution of the contract. Whether a promise is made or not, it is between the parties to uphold it to their fullest potential. The parties cannot enforce and the judges who had made the decision concluded that the court cannot come into marital affairs and it is up to their full knowledge for solving their own problems. So the Balfour vs Balfour case law gave a new perspective to contract validation.

Keywords - balfour vs balfour case study, balfour vs balfour case judgement, balfour vs balfour case law, mr balfour vs mrs balfour