Blog Details

Introduction

The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973, a procedural law, provides the legal framework for the administration of criminal justice in India. Section 220 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, deals with the provisions related to the joint trial of persons accused of committing the same offence. The main object of the provision is to bring together, in the same trial, persons who are alleged to have participated in the same transaction and who have been charged with the commission of the same offence.

Joint trial is a form of trial in which two or more accused persons are tried for the same offence at the same time and with the same evidence. It is a cost-effective measure aimed at saving the time of the court, witnesses, lawyers and the accused. Joint trials are conducted in civil as well as criminal cases. In criminal cases, joint trials are conducted in cases where two or more persons are charged with committing the same offence or different offences arising out of the same transaction.

History of Joint Trial under Sec 220 of CrPC

The concept of joint trial has been in existence since the British period in India. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1861, provided the provisions regarding the joint trial of cases. Section 233 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1861 provided that “when two or more persons are jointly charged with any offence, they may be tried together, or separately, as the Court thinks fit”. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, also contains provisions regarding the joint trial of cases. Section 220 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides that “When persons accused of the same offence are tried together, the whole of the evidence need not be taken in the case of each of such persons, but the evidence taken in the case of one of them may be used as evidence in the case of the other”.

Meaning of Joint Trial

Joint trial is a form of trial in which two or more accused persons are tried for the same offence at the same time and with the same evidence. It is a cost-effective measure aimed at saving the time of the court, witnesses, lawyers and the accused. Joint trials are conducted in civil as well as criminal cases. In criminal cases, joint trials are conducted in cases where two or more persons are charged with committing the same offence or different offences arising out of the same transaction.

Objective of Joint Trial

The objective of joint trial is to bring together, in the same trial, persons who are alleged to have participated in the same transaction and who have been charged with the commission of the same offence. It is also aimed at saving the time of the court, the prosecution, the defence and the accused. Joint trials are also useful in cases where the evidence of one accused can be used against the other accused. This helps to avoid a repetition of the same evidence in the trial of each accused.

Procedure of Joint Trial

The procedure of a joint trial is laid down in Section 222 of the CrPC. According to this section, when two or more persons are charged with the same offence, they may be tried together. The court shall frame the charge in such a way that it would be applicable to all the accused. The court shall record the evidence and examine the witnesses separately in respect of each accused. The court may, if it thinks fit, direct that the evidence in respect of one accused may be used as evidence in respect of the other accused. However, the court shall record its reasons for making such a direction.

Advantages of Joint Trial Joint trial has several advantages.

It is a cost-effective measure as it saves the time of the court, the prosecution, the defence and the accused. It also helps to avoid a repetition of the same evidence in the trial of each accused, thereby making the trial more efficient. In addition, joint trials are useful in cases where the evidence of one accused can be used against the other accused. This helps to avoid a repetition of the same evidence in the trial of each accused. It is also beneficial as it avoids multiple trials in respect of the same offence, thereby reducing the burden of the court.

Disadvantages of Joint Trial

Despite its advantages, joint trial also has some disadvantages. It can be difficult for the court to decide the quantum of punishment for each accused in a joint trial. This is because the court has to consider the evidence of each accused separately in order to determine the quantum of punishment. In addition, the accused may be prejudiced if the evidence against one accused is used against the other accused. This may result in an unfair trial.

Conclusion

Joint trial is a cost-effective measure aimed at saving the time of the court, witnesses, lawyers and the accused. It has several advantages such as saving the time of the court, the prosecution, the defence and the accused, avoiding a repetition of the same evidence in the trial of each accused, and avoiding multiple trials in respect of the same offence. However, it also has some disadvantages such as difficulty in deciding the quantum of punishment for each accused, and prejudice to the accused if the evidence against one accused is used against the other accused.